In a fresh wave of fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files, newly released emails have pulled Sarah Ferguson back into the spotlight. The messages show the former Duchess of York personally putting her young goddaughter in touch with Epstein after his first prison term, as she now quietly retreats to a high-priced Swiss clinic while her ex-husband faces his own legal crisis.
TLDR
Newly disclosed Epstein emails show Sarah Ferguson introducing her goddaughter to the disgraced financier in 2010, deepening scrutiny of her judgment, finances, and decision to seek refuge in an exclusive Swiss wellness clinic.
New Emails, Old Scandal
According to the Daily Mail, emails released by the US Department of Justice as part of the latest tranche of Epstein documents show Ferguson sending contact details for her goddaughter, Poppy Cotterell, to Epstein in November 2010. The exchange took place about 16 months after Epstein had been released from a Florida prison, where he served time for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
The outlet reports that the email, sent from an account identified as Sarah, was titled “Poppy Cotterell’s contact info” and ended with a breezy sign-off that read, “Over to you! Lots of love.” Epstein, the emails suggest, followed up by arranging a meeting with the then 22-year-old and considering both employing her and making a $100,000 charitable donation in her name to a children’s health organization.

Cotterell is not a random connection. Her mother, Carolyn, once served as a lady-in-waiting to Ferguson and is godmother to the duchess’s elder daughter, Princess Beatrice. The email chain underlines how deeply Ferguson’s social and family circle intersected with Epstein at a time when his criminal history was widely known.
The release of these messages comes as the broader Epstein scandal has reportedly culminated in the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Ferguson’s ex-husband, intensifying focus on every past decision that tied the couple to the disgraced financier.
The Goddaughter Caught in the Middle
Through it all, Poppy Cotterell has been thrust into a story she clearly did not choose. In comments given to The Sun and cited by the Daily Mail, she described how the introduction unfolded from her perspective.
“In 2010, at the age of 22, I was working in New York as an intern at an art gallery when I was introduced to Mr. Epstein about a possible job looking after his art collection,” she said. Cotterell confirmed that the meeting did lead to an offer, but she walked away. “After meeting Mr. Epstein, he offered me a role, which I declined. I never met him again.”
She also addressed the suggestion that Epstein planned a $100,000 donation in her name to a charity run by Dr. Woodson Merrell. “I was not aware of Dr Woodson Merrell’s charity before I met Mr Epstein, did not request a donation to be made to it, and do not know if a donation was ever made,” she explained.

Her comments paint a picture of a young woman briefly stepping into Epstein’s orbit through a trusted family connection, then stepping straight back out. Yet the optics for Ferguson are very different. For a royal figure whose public brand has long included children’s books, charity work, and grandmotherly warmth, the idea of guiding a goddaughter toward a man already convicted in a child-related case lands heavily.
Patterns of Questioned Judgment
The newly surfaced emails are not an isolated misstep. They join a longer timeline of Ferguson’s entanglements with Epstein that has repeatedly forced her to explain her judgment in public.
The Daily Mail notes that Ferguson had already faced criticism for taking her daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, to meet Epstein just days after his release from prison for child sex offenses. Other emails reported by the outlet show her appealing to Epstein to help pay down her spiraling debts and even suggesting that he employ her as a house assistant as she “desperately” needed cash, despite knowing he remained under house arrest in Florida.
In one exchange, Ferguson issued a contrite note to Epstein after publicly distancing herself from him. She reportedly framed her earlier denunciation as a career necessity, given her work as a children’s author, and described him in private as a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.”

Even before the latest document releases, Ferguson had publicly acknowledged grave misjudgment over her financial dealings with Epstein. According to BBC News, she apologized in 2010 for accepting money from him to help pay off debts and said she deeply regretted the association. That earlier mea culpa now sits awkwardly beside the fact that she was still facilitating introductions and seeking assistance in the same period the apology addressed.
Taken together, the pattern suggests a long stretch in which Epstein was both a financial lifeline and a social presence in the lives of Ferguson and Andrew. Each new batch of documents makes it harder for the former royal to present her contact with him as a brief or distant acquaintance.
Retreat to a Swiss Sanctuary
As the email revelations surface alongside the dramatic legal developments around Andrew, Ferguson has chosen distance rather than defiance. The Daily Mail reports that she checked herself into Paracelsus Recovery in Zurich, a clinic frequently described as one of the most expensive wellness facilities in the world.

The lakeside center caters to ultra-wealthy clients, reportedly charging around 13,000 per day for intensive, month-long programs that surround guests with a small army of medical specialists, private chefs, and chauffeurs. A Swiss source told the paper that Ferguson has a history with the clinic and returned there shortly after Christmas, remaining through the end of January.
Another friend quoted by the outlet said she was “absolutely crushed” by the publication of the email exchanges and described Paracelsus as the one place she feels certain of receiving both emotional support and expert care when she is most vulnerable. In the weeks after leaving Zurich, Ferguson is said to have spent time in the French Alps and the United Arab Emirates, keeping herself largely out of the public eye as attention swirls around her ex-husband.
Insiders cited by the Daily Mail describe her lifestyle as “sofa-surfing on a global scale,” suggesting that she has been leaning on her daughters’ travel and social plans to stay under the radar. While Andrew has been photographed repeatedly in Windsor and at Sandringham, Ferguson’s absence from public events has only fueled questions about how she is coping and what her long-term plan might be.
Royal Image, Private Choices
Ferguson has always lived at the intersection of royal tradition, modern celebrity, and financial strain. Since the 1990s, she has swung between scandal and second chances, from tabloid photographs to daytime television, book deals, and charity campaigns built around resilience and children’s well-being.
The Epstein chapter strikes at the heart of that carefully rebuilt narrative. It places the former duchess in the uncomfortable position of explaining why a man convicted of crimes involving minors remained close enough that she was still taking her daughters to meet him, still asking for financial help, and still connecting a young goddaughter to his world.
For the monarchy, the reputational cost stretches beyond a single figure. The story lands at a time when public trust in institutions is fragile and when the royal family has repeatedly promised greater accountability. Ferguson may no longer be a working royal, but she is permanently linked to the Windsor story through her daughters and her long, complicated bond with Andrew.
What emerges from the emails is not a single catastrophic moment, but a series of choices in which loyalty, money, and judgment collided. Whether the public ultimately sees this as a painful miscalculation or an unforgivable pattern will shape not only Ferguson’s legacy, but also the space her daughters and future grandchildren occupy in the royal narrative.
Join the Discussion
How do these newly revealed emails affect the way you see Sarah Ferguson’s past decisions around Epstein, and can a public figure ever truly rebuild after this kind of scrutiny?